Back to Case Studies

Web development

How a web development company turned customer support into a scalable process with Monday.com

Client requests lived in email and Slack — hard to assign, track, and see workload. A Monday.com system with Make.com made support scalable as the company grew.

  • Monday.com
  • Make.com
  • Everhour
  • Slack
  • Email

Quick Overview

Industry
Web development and technical support
Business areas
Customer support, project management, and operations
Automation type
Ticket management and tracking
Services provided
Process design, Monday.com implementation, integration, and automation
Tools
Monday.com, Make.com, Everhour, Slack, and email
Key result
The company was able to expand its team and take on new clients without relying on a manual support-request management process.

The Challenge

The company received customer support requests by email. After receiving a request, the project manager had to review the message, identify the appropriate person, and forward the information to the relevant team member.

Depending on the request, the task could involve project managers, designers, or other members of the technical team.

This process created several problems.

Emails could become buried under other messages, especially when requests arrived outside business hours. There was also a risk that the person responsible would forget to forward a request or complete the necessary follow-up.

Internal coordination took place through a combination of email and Slack. This fragmented the information and made it difficult to determine:

  • Who was responsible for each ticket.
  • Which stage the task had reached.
  • How long the ticket had been open.
  • How many requests each client had submitted.
  • How many service hours each client had used.
  • How much work had been assigned to each team member.

In some cases, a request only received further attention after the client sent a follow-up email asking for an update.

In addition to affecting the customer experience, this operating model limited the company’s ability to grow. As the number of clients increased, so did the administrative work required to classify, forward, and monitor every ticket.

The company needed a system that would allow it to handle more requests without losing control or reducing service quality.

The Previous Process

Before the solution was implemented, the process worked approximately as follows:

  1. The client submitted a request by email.
  2. The project manager reviewed the message.
  3. The request was forwarded by email or communicated through Slack.
  4. A team member began working on the task.
  5. Responses and updates were shared through different channels.
  6. The client had to send another email to ask about the status of the request.
  7. Historical information remained distributed across emails and internal conversations.

The process depended heavily on the memory and manual follow-up of the people involved.

The Objective

The project aimed to improve the support experience and create an operation that could grow sustainably.

The primary objectives were to:

  • Prevent tickets from being lost.
  • Reduce the time required to respond to each request.
  • Centralize information.
  • Simplify task assignment.
  • Give clients visibility into the status of their tickets.
  • Improve the use of internal resources.
  • Maintain a history of requests for each client.
  • Measure team workload and performance.
  • Create a process that could support more clients and employees.

The Solution

Syntropic Ops designed a ticket management system using Monday.com as the main platform.

Each client received access to a private interface associated with their own account. From this space, clients could create new requests and view only the information related to their company.

Clients could include all the information required to evaluate the request, including comments, explanations, and Loom links.

When a request was submitted, the system created a corresponding item in a central support board. This board contained all active tickets and served as the internal operational workspace.

The creation of a ticket notified the project manager, who could review the request and assign it to the appropriate person.

From there, the ticket moved through several stages:

  • Request received.
  • Review and assignment.
  • Work estimation.
  • Execution.
  • Review.
  • Delivery.
  • Closure.

Clients could check the status through their own interface without having to request updates by email.

They could also view an estimated completion time in the Delivery Time column. Depending on the complexity of the request, many tickets were handled in less than one business day.

The solution turned Monday.com into a central source of information for both clients and the internal team.

Automation Workflow

  1. 01

    Ticket Creation

    The client accesses their private interface and submits a new request. They can add a description of the issue, comments, supporting context, and Loom links.

  2. 02

    Registration in the Central Board

    The request is replicated in the main support board, where tickets from all clients are managed. The private structure assigned to each client prevents them from accessing information belonging to other companies.

  3. 03

    Notification and Assignment

    The project manager receives a notification and reviews the request. The ticket is then assigned to the appropriate team member, such as a designer or technical specialist.

  4. 04

    Estimation

    The team evaluates the request and estimates the amount of work and expected delivery time. This information becomes available for internal tracking and client visibility.

  5. 05

    Execution

    The assigned team member works on the request and uses Monday.com comments to record progress, questions, and additional information. This keeps all communication related to the task within the same context.

  6. 06

    Review and Delivery

    Once the work is completed, the ticket moves through a review stage before being delivered to the client. The status is updated throughout the process so the client can see whether the request has been received, assigned, is in progress, or has been completed.

  7. 07

    Financial Validation

    When the ticket is completed, the team determines whether the work is included in the client’s existing service plan or represents an additional request. When the ticket relates to a bug covered by the support service, the client receives a notification confirming that no additional charge was generated. When the request involves new work or falls outside the existing support scope, invoicing is managed through Everhour.

  8. 08

    Recordkeeping and Traceability

    Each request is stored with its associated client, date, owner, estimated time, status, and related information. This makes it possible to review historical tickets and analyze the service history of each account.

Technical Challenges

Synchronization Between Boards

One of the main challenges was keeping the client-facing interfaces synchronized with the central support board. Monday.com’s native automations did not support every action required by the designed workflow. Some of the necessary functionality was also limited by the capabilities of the Monday.com API. To address this, Syntropic Ops used Make.com as an integration layer. Several workflows and validations were developed to replicate and update the required information between boards, keeping the client experience connected with the internal operation.

Billing Logic

The system also needed to distinguish between different types of requests. Not every ticket was billable. The workflow needed to separate support issues covered under the existing service from new requests that required invoicing. This classification connected the operational process with financial validation and allowed invoices to be managed through Everhour when necessary.

Synchronization Backup

To improve reliability, the system included two execution methods. The primary synchronization ran instantly. An additional scheduled workflow was also configured to review and update the boards once per day. Although failures in the instant integration were rare, the scheduled workflow acted as an additional safeguard to prevent a ticket or update from remaining unsynchronized.

Results

The implementation produced confirmed operational and business improvements.

Greater Capacity for Growth

The company was able to continue hiring employees and taking on new clients. Before the project, the manual work associated with ticket management limited the company’s ability to grow. Every new client increased the number of emails, follow-ups, and assignments the team needed to manage. With the new system, the process no longer depended entirely on manual actions or the project manager’s memory.

Lower Risk of Lost Requests

Tickets no longer depended on whether an email remained visible in someone’s inbox. Every request was recorded in a central system with a status, an owner, and a searchable history.

Improved Customer Experience

Clients could check the progress of their requests directly. This reduced the need to send emails asking for updates and created a more transparent support experience.

Better Internal Coordination

Comments, statuses, owners, and dates were centralized in Monday.com. The team could manage work without distributing important information across multiple emails and Slack conversations.

Workload Visibility

The system made it possible to see how many tasks were assigned to each person and understand how work was distributed across the team. This visibility supported more efficient resource allocation.

Performance Measurement

The recorded information made it possible to analyze indicators related to team performance, including time required to complete tasks, effectiveness in completing assigned work, number of tickets handled, performance comparisons, and workload by team member. This information also supported internal decisions related to performance, responsibilities, and potential salary adjustments.

Strong Team Adoption

The team adopted the system effectively. The solution addressed problems employees had experienced for a long time, including ticket backlogs, unclear priorities, and limited visibility into each person’s workload. Because the system made daily work easier, adoption happened efficiently and the team responded positively to the change.

Business Impact

The primary impact of the project was the transformation of customer support into a more structured and scalable process.

The company gained a centralized view of its requests and reduced its dependence on fragmented communication channels.

This allowed the business to:

  • Maintain service quality while adding new clients.
  • Increase operational capacity without increasing administrative work at the same rate.
  • Improve assignment speed.
  • Reduce the risk of forgotten requests.
  • Provide greater transparency to clients.
  • Use team capacity more effectively.
  • Make internal decisions based on operational data.
  • Distinguish between covered support work and billable requests.

The solution did more than improve ticket management. It also created an operational database that helped the company understand client activity, service usage, and team performance.

Key Learnings

1. Adoption Depends on Solving a Real Problem

The team adopted the solution because it directly addressed problems that affected their daily work. When an automation reduces friction and makes work easier, adoption does not depend only on training or internal instructions.

2. Centralization Does Not Require Giving Everyone the Same Visibility

The internal team needed a central board containing all requests, while each client needed access only to their own information. The design addressed both needs by combining a centralized internal operation with a private client experience.

3. Native Automations Are Not Always Enough

A platform’s standard features may cover a significant part of a process, but more specific workflows can require an additional integration layer. Make.com made it possible to overcome limitations in Monday.com’s native automations and API.

4. Critical Processes Need Backup Mechanisms

The scheduled daily synchronization provided an additional safeguard against potential failures in the instant workflow. In a support operation, reliability depends not only on the workflow functioning normally, but also on having a method for detecting or correcting exceptions.

Conclusion

The company moved from managing requests through emails and disconnected conversations to operating a centralized support system in Monday.com.

The solution created by Syntropic Ops connected ticket intake, team assignment, client communication, work tracking, and financial validation.

The result was an operation with greater traceability, improved visibility, and the capacity to grow without allowing manual ticket management to become a bottleneck.

This project demonstrates that effective automation is not simply about connecting tools. It requires understanding the process, defining responsibilities, planning for exceptions, and creating a system that people can adopt as part of their daily work.

Is your team still managing support requests by email? Syntropic Ops designs support and operations systems that centralize information, reduce manual work, and help companies deliver consistent service as they grow.